[PATCH RFC v2 07/29] PCI/MSI: Return -ENOSYS for unimplemented interfaces, not -1
From: Alexander Gordeev
Date: Sat Oct 19 2013 - 02:19:44 EST
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/pci.h | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index d3a888a..5cfe54c 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -1148,13 +1148,13 @@ struct msix_entry {
#ifndef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
static inline int pci_enable_msi_block(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int nvec)
{
- return -1;
+ return -ENOSYS;
}
static inline int
pci_enable_msi_block_auto(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int *maxvec)
{
- return -1;
+ return -ENOSYS;
}
static inline void pci_msi_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev)
@@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ static inline int pci_msix_table_size(struct pci_dev *dev)
static inline int pci_enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev,
struct msix_entry *entries, int nvec)
{
- return -1;
+ return -ENOSYS;
}
static inline void pci_msix_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev)
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/