Re: [PATCH] crypto: n2_core: insert '!err' condition in else scope

From: Geyslan GregÃrio Bem
Date: Sat Oct 19 2013 - 19:13:30 EST


2013/10/19 David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> From: Geyslan GregÃrio Bem <geyslan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 19:42:35 -0300
>
>> 2013/10/19 David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> From: "Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 10:09:31 -0300
>>>
>>>> This patch moves the '!err' condition into the above else scope,
>>>> what is more obvious and has the secondary goal of avoid false-positives
>>>> in statical analyze tools.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> I do not think patches should be applied to satisfy tools if the
>>> code is semantically correct.
>>
>> Yes, Miller, I agree. But as I mentioned:
>> ".. and has as the 'secondary' goal of avoid false-positives in
>> statical analyze tools."
>>
>> The 'primary' goal is to not repeat a condition test:
>> "This patch moves the '!err' condition into the above else scope, what
>> is more obvious ..."
>
> I still do not feel that this change is a net-positive. Sorry.
Miller,

I can understand you. You don't want to break your git history
(blame). But when a code is clearly more readable/understandable you
must assume that it has a huge net-positive.

The patch improves the code in three ways:
- Only one if/else;
- Not blame on static analysis tools.
- And avoid more discussion about that in the future (nobody will send
patches like this to disturb you about that part of code).

The decision is yours.

Thanks again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/