RE: [BUG] spi/spi-atmel: DMA rx buffer corruption withSPI_IOC_MESSAGE

[Yang, Wenyou]

Hi Richard,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Genoud [mailto:richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 2013å10æ17æ 19:01
> To: Yang, Wenyou
> Cc: linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ferre, Nicolas;
> Mark Brown
> Subject: Re: [BUG] spi/spi-atmel: DMA rx buffer corruption with
> SPI_IOC_MESSAGE
> 
> 2013/10/8 Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I finally found the bug I saw months ago, before "[PATCH v8 3/8]
> > spi/spi-atmel: add dmaengine support" was merged.
> >
> > Here it is:
> >
> > When the ioctl SPI_IOC_MESSAGE is used with small and big buffers,
> > the big RX buffer is corrupted with bytes from the big TX buffer.
> > (Small means size < DMA_MIN_BYTES, Big means size >
> DMA_MIN_BYTES)
> >
> > I'm attaching the test software that I used ( ./spi_test /dev/spidevx.x )
> >
> > It fills 3 TX buffers with 0xAA pattern: a small, a big and a small again.
> > It reads in return 3 RX buffers.
> > The MISO pin has to be on 3.3v.
> >
> > It checks if the received buffers are filled with 0xFF (they should
> > be, as MISO is high).
> > And I've got a lot of buffers filled partially with 0xAA bytes.
> >
> > BUT, if you apply this patch:
> > ---8<----
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> > index 83cf609..cde42a4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> > @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
> >  /* use PIO for small transfers, avoiding DMA setup/teardown overhead
> and
> >   * cache operations; better heuristics consider wordsize and bitrate.
> >   */
> > -#define DMA_MIN_BYTES  16
> > +#define DMA_MIN_BYTES  0
> >
> >  struct atmel_spi_dma {
> >         struct dma_chan                 *chan_rx;
> > ---8<----
> > There's no error any more.
> > So there's something wrong happening when switching from/to pio
> > transfer to/from DMA.
> >
> > We didn't saw that at the time of the merge because we did the test
> > with a loop on MISO/MOSI,
> > so the RX buffer was corrupted with identical bytes.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Richard.
> 
> Hi Wenyou,
> 
> Did you have the opportunity to give it a test ?
> 
> Thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/8/329
I tried to reproduce it with this thread, but I didn't
Which slave device did you use? 

> 
> Richard.

Best Regards,
Wenyou Yang
èº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËlzwm…ébëæìr¸›zX§»®w¥Š{ayºÊÚë,j­¢f£¢·hš‹àz¹®w¥¢¸¢·¦j:+v‰¨ŠwèjØm¶Ÿÿ¾«‘êçzZ+ƒùšŽŠÝj"ú!¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^¶m§ÿðÃnÆàþY&—