Re: [PATCH 00/23 v2] cleanup: introduce br/netdev/netif/wiphy_<foo>_ratelimited()and use them to simplify code
From: Kefeng Wang
Date: Mon Oct 21 2013 - 07:26:37 EST
On 10/18 12:11, Joe Perches wrote:
> (resending to lists only because of multiple X's in the subject line)
>
> On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 11:52 +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> v1-v2:
>>
>> Introduce macro br/netdev/netif/wiphy_XXX_ratelimited() according
>> to Joe Perches's advice. The macros are similar to net_XXX_ratelimited()
>> which is more clarifying than net_ratelimited_function(), then use them
>> to simplify code.
>
> There are some conceptual differences between these
> implementations and other <foo>_ratelimited uses.
>
> For every other subsystem but net, there is a per-location
> struct ratelimit_state.
yes, but I think I just changed net subsystem. Macro DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE used
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL and DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST, so what do you think?
Could anyone give me some advises ?
> Here you've made the global net_ratelimit_state replace all
> of these individual structs so there is some new interaction.
>
> Dunno if that's good or bad.
>
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/