Re: [PATCH] x86 kconfig: Add recommendation to enable paravirtspinlock

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Mon Oct 21 2013 - 12:31:05 EST


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 09:35:08PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> Since paravirt spinlock optimization are in 3.12 kernel, we have
> very good performance benefit for paravirtualized KVM / Xen kernel.
> Also we no longer suffer from 5% side effect on native kernel.

Yeey!
>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Would like to thank Sander for spotting and suggesting this.
> pvspinlock benefit on KVM link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/6/178
>
> Attilio's tests on native kernel impact:
> http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2012/05/11/benchmarking-the-new-pv-ticketlock-implementation/
>
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index f67e839..4ba9d32 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -638,10 +638,10 @@ config PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
> spinlock implementation with something virtualization-friendly
> (for example, block the virtual CPU rather than spinning).
>
> - Unfortunately the downside is an up to 5% performance hit on
> - native kernels, with various workloads.
> + It has minimal impact on native kernels and gives nice performance
> + benefit for paravirtualized KVM / Xen kernels.
>
> - If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
> + If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer Y.
>
> source "arch/x86/xen/Kconfig"
>
> --
> 1.7.11.7
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/