Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 4/6] clocksource: kona: Add basic use ofexternal clock
From: Tim Kryger
Date: Mon Oct 21 2013 - 17:07:39 EST
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:47:08PM +0100, Tim Kryger wrote:
>> When an clock handle is specified in the device tree, enable it and use
>> it to determine the external clock frequency.
>
> I'd drop handle here and just say "When a clock is specified".
>
> This will need a binding document update.
Can you be more specific about what you are looking for here?
Shall I just say that the frequency property is now deprecated since
it actually belongs to the external clock whose association with a
kona timer instance might be declared in the DT using the common clock
bindings but could also be declared through other means?
>> Signed-off-by: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Matt Porter <matt.porter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/clocksource/bcm_kona_timer.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/bcm_kona_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/bcm_kona_timer.c
>> index 0d7d8c3..fd11f96 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/bcm_kona_timer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/bcm_kona_timer.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> #include <linux/clockchips.h>
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <asm/mach/time.h>
>> @@ -107,11 +108,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id bcm_timer_ids[] __initconst = {
>> static void __init kona_timers_init(struct device_node *node)
>> {
>> u32 freq;
>> + struct clk *external_clk;
>>
>> - if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &freq))
>> + external_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(node, NULL);
>
> Is there only a single external clock input to the kona timer, or is
> only one relevant here?
>
> Are there any other inputs currently not modelled (e.g. regulators)?
The timer block relies upon a single clock and does not use any regulators.
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ERR(external_clk)) {
>> + arch_timer_rate = clk_get_rate(external_clk);
>> + clk_prepare_enable(external_clk);
>> + } else if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &freq)) {
>> arch_timer_rate = freq;
>> - else
>> - panic("clock-frequency not set in the .dts file");
>> + } else {
>> + panic("neither clock-frequency or clocks handle in .dts file");
>
> Nit: it's not a handle, it's a phandle+args pair.
>
> Why not just "Unable to determine clock frequency"?
Sure that sounds fine.
>
> Do we need to panic here? Might a system have other clocks it could use
> to continue?
I completely agree that this driver could be improved. However, this
is unrelated to the topic of this series so I will address it later in
a separate patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/