Re: ktap inclusion in drivers/staging/?

[Jovi Zhangwei]

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Em Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 08:11:36PM +0800, Jovi Zhangwei escreveu:
>> I admit there have many places need to cleanup in ktap code, and there
>> also have a long todo list, I will finish it before start review process.
>>
>> Again, really sorry for this, please forgive me this mistake.
>
> Just go eroding it, try to figure out things that could be useful on its
> own, find the right place in the tree, send a flow of small self
> contained patches that comes with tooling that uses whatever new kernel
> feature that is added.
>
> I think that even if you just add a 'perf test' entry that shows how the
> new feature should be used by tooling, exercising it and checking its
> results, so that every time people try 'perf test' it gets re verified,
> that would be ok when no other tools/ living source code exercises it.
>

Nice, I will take some time to look at it.

Thank you.

Jovi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/