Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

[Ingo Molnar]

* Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:24:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/mmzone.h:9:0,
> >                  from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/gfp.h:4,
> >                  from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/kmod.h:22,
> >                  from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/module.h:13,
> >                  from /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c:2:
> > /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c: In function 'blk_mq_queue_enter':
> > /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/wait.h:772:2: error: expected ';' before '__ret'
> >   __ret;        \
> >   ^
> > /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c:108:8: note: in expansion of macro 'wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq'
> >   ret = wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq(q->mq_freeze_wq,
> >         ^
> > /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c:108:6: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
> >   ret = wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq(q->mq_freeze_wq,
> >       ^
> > 
> > Caused by commit 35a2af94c7ce ("sched/wait: Make the __wait_event*()
> > interface more friendly").
> > 
> > Since this was also in next-20131025, I applied the following merge fix
> > commit for today, please fix this in the tip tree.
> 
> FWIW I got confirmation on Oct 23 that this had been committed to the
> tip tree. So I guess it just wasn't pushed yet.

I merged the fix intoo the linux-next branch earlier today so it 
should be resolved soon.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/