Re: [PATCH] X86: MM: Add PAT Type write-through in combination withmtrr

[Borislav Petkov]

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:03:58PM +0100, Andreas Werner wrote:
> > That doesn't mean you can return _PAGE_CACHE_WB for MTRR_TYPE_WRTHROUGH.
> > The correct thing to do, IMHO, would be to set the PWT bit in the PTEs
> > of those pages comprising your buffer.
> > 
> But why? the combination of PAT=WB and MTRR=WT is allowed isnÂt it?
> What should i return instead of?

Well, since the pat code can't give you PWT, I'm thinking the cleaner
thing would be to do it yourself. I.e., allocate a WT buffer with
mtrr_add and then set the PWT bit of each page in that buffer.

Alternatively, your solution - albeit not that correct - is a simple one
and probably could use a good comment in the code explaining why you're
doing that if we decide to go that way.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/