Re: [PATCH 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding

[Stephen Boyd]

On 10/28, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:31:28AM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- interrupt-names: Should contain the interrupt names "l1_irq" and
> > +  "l2_irq"
> 
> As with my comment on the parsing code, I'd prefer that if interrupt-names was
> present it defined the order of interrupts. Otherwise it's redundant and of no
> value.
> 
> Otherwise, the binding looks fine to me:
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>

How about I just drop the interrupt-names property? It isn't
adding much and is a holdover from the vendor kernel.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/