Re: [PATCH 0/2] make all stored entries accessible.

[Madper Xie]

tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx writes:

>> So, do you mean efivars should fix to use the "id" in a proper way?
>
> It would avoid the need for all these tests, and additions to the filename to guarantee
> uniqueness.
>
> Not sure what options efivars has to create a unique, persistent "id" for each
> record.  It's a fundamental part of how ERST works (though the unique ID is just
> based around a timestamp).
>
Okay, maybe there are three options here:
1. combine timestamp, count and part into "id".
   for now, in efi-pstore.c, *id = part. and we could simply change it
   to unique one. F.E. *id = (timestamp * 100 + part) * 100 + count.
2. change the id's type. let id become a string.
   so every backend could write anything to id. then it will become a
   part of filename in pstore filesystem. (but we need fix all backends
   since we modified api.)
3. apply the patches I have sent... even if the filename will be ugly
   and gory...
Which one do you prefer?
>> I acked Madper's patch 2/2 earlier today, but when I look at your test result, I'm not sure if
>> it is reasonable for users to make multiple numbers visible to the file name.
>>
>>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 17499 Oct 30 13:41 dmesg-erst-5940651313304961029--2129078373-1383165669
>
> after I added the "count = 0" initialization the filename gets a tiny bit less
> scary:
>
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 17499 Oct 30 13:41 dmesg-erst-5940651313304961029-0-1383165669
>
> -Tony


-- 
Best,
Madper Xie.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/