Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the tree

[Jens Axboe]

On 11/01/2013 02:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 09:10:43 -0600 Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/31/2013 09:20 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
>>> drivers/block/loop.c between commit 2486740b52fd ("loop: use aio to
>>> perform io on the underlying file") from the aio-direct tree and commit
>>> ed2d2f9a8265 ("block: Abstract out bvec iterator") from the block tree.
>>>
>>> I fixed it up (I think - see below - I have also attached the final
>>> resulting file) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is
>>> required).
>>>
>>
>> What tree is this from? It'd be a lot more convenient to fold that loop
>> patch into my tree, especially since the block tree in linux-next failed
>> after this merge.
> 
> I can only agree with you.  It is from the aio-direct tree (probably
> misnamed by me) (git://github.com/kleikamp/linux-shaggy.git#for-next) run
> by Dave Kleikamp.

Dave, input requested.

In any case, I would suggest dropping the aio-direct tree instead of the
entire block tree for coverage purposes, if merge or build failures
happen because of it.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/