Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] phy: add phy_get_bus_width()/phy_set_bus_width()calls

[Kishon Vijay Abraham I]

Hi Tomasz,

On Saturday 02 November 2013 06:44 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On Friday 01 of November 2013 15:45:50 Matt Porter wrote:
> > This adds a pair of APIs that allows the generic PHY subsystem to
> > provide information on the PHY bus width. The PHY provider driver may
> > use phy_set_bus_width() to set the bus width that the PHY supports.
> > The controller driver may then use phy_get_bus_width() to fetch the
> > PHY bus width in order to properly configure the controller.
>
> I somehow does not like this. If we take this path for any further
> properties that we may need, we will end up with a lot of consumer
> specific properties stored in a PHY object having their own accessor
> functions.

Only after all of us feel that a property is *generic* enough, we allow 
it to be added in the PHY object.
> Since this is just an integration detail, what about simply adding this as
> a property in device tree node of the OTG controller (and pdata if
> considering non-DT support)?

We already had a discussion about this and the dt maintainers suggested 
the property should be in the PHY. [1]

[1] ->  http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg08851.html

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/