RE: [PATCH] [extcon]:remove freed groups caused the panic orwarning in unregister flow
From: Wang, Xiaoming
Date: Sun Nov 03 2013 - 21:08:00 EST
Dear Choi
-----Original Message-----
From: Chanwoo Choi [mailto:cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 9:43 AM
To: Wang, Xiaoming
Cc: myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Liu, Chuansheng; Zhang, Dongxing
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [extcon]:remove freed groups caused the panic or warning in unregister flow
Hi Wang,
> drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c index 148382f..48f4669 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
> @@ -794,6 +794,8 @@ void extcon_dev_unregister(struct extcon_dev *edev)
> return;
> }
>
> + device_unregister(edev->dev);
> +
> if (edev->mutually_exclusive && edev->max_supported) {
> for (index = 0; edev->mutually_exclusive[index];
> index++)
> @@ -814,7 +816,6 @@ void extcon_dev_unregister(struct extcon_dev *edev)
> if (switch_class)
> class_compat_remove_link(switch_class, edev->dev, NULL); #endif
> - device_unregister(edev->dev);
> put_device(edev->dev);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_dev_unregister);
>
I think we could only apply following patch instead of moving the position of device_unregister().
diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c index 148382f..ff27b19 100644
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c
@@ -805,10 +805,8 @@ void extcon_dev_unregister(struct extcon_dev *edev)
for (index = 0; index < edev->max_supported; index++)
kfree(edev->cables[index].attr_g.name);
- if (edev->max_supported) {
- kfree(edev->extcon_dev_type.groups);
+ if (edev->max_supported)
kfree(edev->cables);
- }
#if defined(CONFIG_ANDROID)
if (switch_class)
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
I don't agree with you.
Why do not you want moving the position of device_unregister()?
It will cause the memory leak if has not kfree edev->extcon_dev_type.groups as your patch do firstly. And if you think kfree edev->extcon_dev_type.groups is meaningless well then kfree edev->extcon_dev_type.groups in function exton_dev_register (line 756)also should be removed I think. What do you think?
Thanks
Xiaoming.
¢éì®&Þ~º&¶¬+-±éÝ¥w®Ë±Êâmébìdz¹Þ)í
æèw*jg¬±¨¶Ýj/êäz¹Þà2Þ¨èÚ&¢)ß«a¶Úþø®G«éh®æj:+v¨wèÙ>W±êÞiÛaxPjØm¶ÿÃ-»+ùd_