Re: [PATCH -next] get_maintainer: Improve "Author:" rolestats

[Joe Perches]

On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 13:45 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> If really as what I guess above (some patches no Signed-of-by), is there
> a tool to check and find this issue in time?

scripts/checkpatch.pl bleats a message on missing sign-offs.

For instance:

$ cat cache.diff
 include/linux/cache.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cache.h b/include/linux/cache.h
index 4c57065..17e7e82 100644
--- a/include/linux/cache.h
+++ b/include/linux/cache.h
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 #ifndef __LINUX_CACHE_H
 #define __LINUX_CACHE_H
 
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/kernel.h>
 #include <asm/cache.h>
 
 #ifndef L1_CACHE_ALIGN
-#define L1_CACHE_ALIGN(x) ALIGN(x, L1_CACHE_BYTES)
+#define L1_CACHE_ALIGN(x) __ALIGN_KERNEL(x, L1_CACHE_BYTES)
 #endif
 
 #ifndef SMP_CACHE_BYTES

$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl cache.diff
ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)

total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 13 lines checked

cache.diff has style problems, please review.

If any of these errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/