Re: [PATCH 1/5] OF: Clear detach flag on attach

[Gerhard Sittig]

On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 19:50 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> 
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -1641,6 +1641,7 @@ int of_attach_node(struct device_node *np)
>  	np->allnext = of_allnodes;
>  	np->parent->child = np;
>  	of_allnodes = np;
> +	of_node_clear_flag(np, OF_DETACHED);
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
>  
>  	of_add_proc_dt_entry(np);

Does this add a call to a routine which only gets introduced in a
subsequent patch (2/5)?  If so, it would break builds during the
series, and thus would hinder bisection.


virtually yours
Gerhard Sittig
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office@xxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/