Re: Async runtime put in __device_release_driver()

[Ulf Hansson]

On 23 October 2013 12:11, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was debugging why clocks were left enabled after removing omapdss
> driver, and I found this commit:
>
> fa180eb448fa263cf18dd930143b515d27d70d7b (PM / Runtime: Idle devices
> asynchronously after probe|release)
>
> I don't understand how that is supposed to work.
>
> When a driver is removed, instead of using pm_runtime_put_sync() the
> commit uses pm_runtime_put(), so the runtime_suspend call is queued. But
> who is going to handle the queued suspend call, as the driver is already
> removed? At least in my case, obviously nobody, as I only get
> runtime_resume call in my driver, never the runtime_suspend.
>
> Is there something I need to add to my driver to make this work, or
> should that part of the patch be reverted?

I believe it is quite common that a device driver calls
pm_runtime_get_sync as a part of it's remove callback, then it
explicitly returns it's resources that has been fetched during probe.
Like a clk_disable_unprepare for example.

The idea behind the change in __device_release_driver, was to try to
prevent  devices from going active->idle->active and instead just
remain active (if possible).

In your case, which seems like a more modern way of implementing
"remove", you shall call "pm_runtime_suspend" to make sure the
runtime_suspend callbacks gets called.

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson

>
>  Tomi
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/