Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio

[Prabhakar Lad]

Hi Linus,

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad
> <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar
>>> <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixes the check for the offset in
>>>> gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Is this a regression that should go in right now?
>>>
>> Yes it needs too.
>
> But on top of *what* exactly?
>
> This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and
> not even on the mainline kernel.
>
Looks like this needs to go via ARM tree as the earlier
patches have  gone via ARM tree itself [1].
If you can ACK it Sekhar can get it in via ARM tree.

> Is this something that should go on top of the davinci
> GPIO patch set that is still being elaborated on?
>
Nope.

[1]  http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg275267.html

Regards,
--Prabhakar Lad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/