Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] phy: Add new Exynos USB PHY driver

[Tomasz Figa]

Hi David,

On Wednesday 06 of November 2013 13:03:45 David Laight wrote:
> > > I just did a diff of registers in exynos 4210 and 4212 PHY drivers [1]
> > > and couldn't find that big a difference in register layout. Of course
> > > there are a few changes in HSIC bit fields and PHYFSEL but that's only
> > > minimal and could well be handled in a single driver.
> > >
> > > [1] -> http://diffchecker.com/py3tp68m
> > 
> > This is quite a lot of differences, especially including shifted
> > bitfields... In addition there is another set of available PHYs
> > and inter-dependencies between them.
> 
> Might be worth feeding both files through "sed -e 's/_421[02]_/_421x_/'"
> prior to doing the diff.
> And maybe changing the order of some definitions so they match.
> Then the actual differences will be more obvious.

I have fed it already through my built-in sed when reading.

Still despite many similarities, I think there is enough difference to
justify having different callback functions for both, especially based on
my experience with the old Exynos USB2 PHY driver in drivers/usb/phy, when
trying to make it more complete.

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/