Re: [PATCH] rbtree/test: testrbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe()

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed,  6 Nov 2013 13:37:23 -0800 Cody P Schafer <cody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ...
>
> --- a/lib/rbtree_test.c
> +++ b/lib/rbtree_test.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ static int black_path_count(struct rb_node *rb)
>  	return count;
>  }
>  
> +static void check_postorder_foreach(int nr_nodes)
> +{
> +	struct test_node *cur, *n;
> +	int count = 0;
> +	rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(cur, n, &root, rb)
> +		count++;
> +
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(count != nr_nodes);
> +}
> +
>  static void check_postorder(int nr_nodes)
>  {
>  	struct rb_node *rb;
> @@ -148,6 +158,7 @@ static void check(int nr_nodes)
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(count < (1 << black_path_count(rb_last(&root))) - 1);
>  
>  	check_postorder(nr_nodes);
> +	check_postorder_foreach(nr_nodes);
>  }
>  
>  static void check_augmented(int nr_nodes)

I'm rather confused about where this fits with the other (and
apparently withdrawn) patches.

Please resend everything?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/