Re: [PATCH] devres: Freeing the drs after all release() are called
From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Nov 06 2013 - 20:54:35 EST
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:18:54AM +0000, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tejun Heo [mailto:htejun@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of tj@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 8:52 AM
> > To: Liu, Chuansheng
> > Cc: Greg KH; dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] devres: Freeing the drs after all release() are called
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:36:56AM +0000, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> > > Yes, I knew I can put the code always like below:
> > > A = devm_kzalloc();
> > > C = devm_kzalloc();
> > > ...
> > > B= devm_request_threaded_irq(isr_handler);
> > >
> > > But, the above is just one simple coding prototype, if there are many calling:
> > > E -- > F -- > D -- >... then to devm_kzalloc().
> > >
> > > To be honest, it will make code too hard to always adapt the rule?
> > > And I trying to find out every potential devm_kzalloc() before irq requesting.
> >
> > It isn't a good idea to paper over existing bugs from upper layer.
> > You realize that the above code sequence is already buggy during init
> > unless there's something explicitly blocking generation of irqs until
> > init is complete, right? The right thing to do would be either
> > reordering the operations or wrapping the operation which unblocks irq
> > at the end of init with devres so that irq gets blocked before the
> > rest of release proceeds.
> >
> > What we must *NOT* do is working around existing bugs in a half-assed
> > way from midlayer.
>
> Yes, doing the right order initialization is always right thing.
> But normally when we hit the panic during shutdown/reboot like below:
> PAGE FAULT XXX 0x12345678
>
> It is really difficult to debug.
> So at least, could we have method to expose these hidden issues?
Have you enabled timer debugging? I think there's an irq debugging
option as well.
We aren't going to paper over driver bugs by changing the kernel core,
sorry. Consider this patch dropped.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/