Re: [PATCH] staging: zsmalloc: Ensure handle is never 0 on success

[Rik van Riel]

On 11/07/2013 02:04 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:

> I'm guilty and I have been busy by other stuff. Sorry for that.
> Fortunately, I discussed this issue with Hugh in this Linuxcon for a
> long time(Thanks Hugh!) he felt zram's block device abstraction is
> better design rather than frontswap backend stuff although it's a question
> where we put zsmalloc. I will CC Hugh because many of things is related
> to swap subsystem and his opinion is really important.
> And I discussed it with Rik and he feel positive about zram.

To clarify that, I agree with Minchan that there are certain
workloads where zram is probably more appropriate than zswap.

For most of the workloads that I am interested in, zswap will
be more interesting, but zram seems to have its own niche, and
I certainly do not want to hold back the embedded folks...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/