[PATCH 3.8 22/91] net: secure_seq: Fix warning when CONFIG_IPV6 and CONFIG_INET are not selected
From: Kamal Mostafa
Date: Thu Nov 07 2013 - 21:18:38 EST
3.8.13.13 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit cb03db9d0e964568407fb08ea46cc2b6b7f67587 ]
net_secret() is only used when CONFIG_IPV6 or CONFIG_INET are selected.
Building a defconfig with both of these symbols unselected (Using the ARM
at91sam9rl_defconfig, for example) leads to the following build warning:
$ make at91sam9rl_defconfig
$ make net/core/secure_seq.o
scripts/kconfig/conf --silentoldconfig Kconfig
CHK include/config/kernel.release
CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
make[1]: `include/generated/mach-types.h' is up to date.
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CC net/core/secure_seq.o
net/core/secure_seq.c:17:13: warning: 'net_secret_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Fix this warning by protecting the definition of net_secret() with these
symbols.
Reported-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ kamal: backport to 3.8 (context) ]
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/secure_seq.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/secure_seq.c b/net/core/secure_seq.c
index e61a8bb..53fcc11 100644
--- a/net/core/secure_seq.c
+++ b/net/core/secure_seq.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <net/secure_seq.h>
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
static u32 net_secret[MD5_MESSAGE_BYTES / 4] ____cacheline_aligned;
static int __init net_secret_init(void)
@@ -18,6 +19,7 @@ static int __init net_secret_init(void)
return 0;
}
late_initcall(net_secret_init);
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_INET
static u32 seq_scale(u32 seq)
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/