On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:06:26PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:On Nov 8, 2013, at 10:57 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:13:19AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:On Nov 5, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:....../devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell,berlin.txt | 24 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 2 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2-sony-nsz-gs7.dts | 29 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 282 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell,berlin.txt
create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2-sony-nsz-gs7.dts
create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/berlin2.dtsi
Haven't we been trying to go away from non-prefixed dts/dtsi?
hmmm, this is the first I've heard of that. Although, your proposal
(in another thread) makes more sense now. :)
So should these be something like marvell-berlin2-...
I don't recall this being brought up at the summit, nor in Grant's
report. I do need to give it a more careful read this weekend, though.
Perhaps I missed something.
This was based on review comments Olof gave when we pushed some .dts
files for MSM/APQ Qualcomm Technologies soc/boards.
As Andrew Lunn mentioned to me earlier, we should consider the fact that
the dts file names are being used by Debian's flash-kernel. Oh no!
Another ABI! ;-)
Yes, the names are mostly stable. ST-Ericsson renamed their dts files
and it caused some pain, some build environments have them hardcoded,
etc.
Still, it is a good idea to start adding new ones using family or
vendor prefixes, so they are easier to group. Please keep that in mind
on new ones too, Jason -- I don't think I've discussed with you in the
past. :-)