Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-at91rm9200: Corrected alarm over day/month wrap:

[Nicolas Ferre]

On 18/11/2013 23:37, Andrew Morton :
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:20:54 +0100 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Linus Pizunski <linus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Update month and day of month to the alarm month/day instead
> > of current day/month when setting the RTC alarm mask.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Pizunski <linus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I changed this to signed-off-by, as you were on the patch delivery path.
>
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c
> > @@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ static int at91_rtc_setalarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
> >
> >   	at91_alarm_year = tm.tm_year;
> >
> > +	tm.tm_mon = alrm->time.tm_mon;
> > +	tm.tm_mday = alrm->time.tm_mday;
> >   	tm.tm_hour = alrm->time.tm_hour;
> >   	tm.tm_min = alrm->time.tm_min;
> >   	tm.tm_sec = alrm->time.tm_sec;
>
> I queued this for 3.13.  Do we think it warrants a -stable backport?

(I am late, but it seems this one is not sent to Linus yet...)

Well, yes, we can tag this one for "-stable". The patch applies on 
nearly each kernel that I can think about (code is from 2.6.17-ish). But 
this patch applies with an offset...

Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/