Re: [PATCH RESEND v10 0/7] cpufreq:boost: CPU Boost mode support

[Lukasz Majewski]

Hi Rafael,

> This patch series introduces support for CPU overclocking technique
> called Boost.
> 
> It is a follow up of a LAB governor proposal. Boost is a LAB
> component:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1484746/match=cpufreq
> 
> Boost unifies hardware based solution (e.g. Intel Nehalem) with
> software oriented one (like the one done at Exynos).
> For this reason cpufreq/freq_table code has been reorganized to
> include common code.
> 
> Important design decisions:
> - Boost related code is compiled-in unconditionally to cpufreq core
> and disabled by default. The cpufreq_driver is responsibile for
> setting boost_supported flag and providing set_boost callback(if HW
> support is needed). For software managed boost, special Kconfig flag -
>   CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW has been defined. It will be selected only
>   when a target platform has thermal framework properly configured.
> 
> - struct cpufreq_driver has been extended with boost related fields:
>         -- boost_supported - when driver supports boosting
>         -- boost_enabled - boost state
>         -- set_boost - callback to function, which is necessary to
>            enable/disable boost
> 
> - Boost sysfs attribute (/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost) is
> visible _only_ when cpufreq driver supports Boost.
> 
> - No special spin_lock for Boost was created. The one from cpufreq
> core was reused.
> 
> - The Boost code doesn't rely on any policy. When boost state is
> changed, then the policy list is iterated and proper adjustements are
> done.
> 
> - To improve safety level, the thermal framework is also extended to
> disable software boosting, when thermal trip point is reached. After
> cooling down the boost can be enabled again. This emulates behaviour
> similar to HW managed boost (like x86)
> 
> Tested at HW:
>        Exynos 4412 3.13-rc2 Linux
>        Intel Core i7-3770 3.13-rc2 Linux
> 
> Above patches were posted on top of kernel_pm/bleeding-edge
> (SHA1: 9483a9f69d5c8f83f1723361bf8340ddfb6475b4)
> 

Rafael, could you pull patches from 1 to 6 of this series? Those are
related to cpufreq core and has already been accepted by Viresh at a
late August this year.
This would facilitate my further cpufreq work.

And about the last patch - related to thermal. It seems that more
discussion NOT related to cpufreq will be ongoing. 

I would prefer to add it as a separate patch to thermal subtree.



> 
> Lukasz Majewski (7):
>   cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core
>   cpufreq:acpi:x86: Adjust the acpi-cpufreq.c code to work with common
>     boost solution
>   cpufreq:boost:Kconfig: Provide support for software managed BOOST
>   cpufreq:exynos:Extend Exynos cpufreq driver to support boost
>     framework
>   Documentation:cpufreq:boost: Update BOOST documentation
>   cpufreq:exynos4x12: Change L0 driver data to CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ
>   thermal:exynos:boost: Automatic enable/disable of BOOST feature (at
>     Exynos4412)
> 
>  Documentation/cpu-freq/boost.txt          |   26 +++----
>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig                   |    4 +
>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm               |   15 ++++
>  drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c            |   86
> +++++++-------------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c                 |
> 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c          |    3 +
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c      |    2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c              |   56 ++++++++++++--
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c |   47 ++++++++++++
> include/linux/cpufreq.h                   |   24 ++++++ 10 files
> changed, 302 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
> 



-- 
-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/