Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: ft1000: ft1000-usb: initialize 'status'with STATUS_SUCCESS in request_code_segment()
From: Chen Gang
Date: Wed Dec 04 2013 - 02:30:00 EST
Oh, another member has already fixed it (found earlier than me), and
integrated it into next-20131203 tree, so this patch is obsoleted.
The related git commit is "8aced95 staging: ft1000: fix use of
potentially uninitialized variable"
Thanks.
On 11/27/2013 05:27 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 11/27/2013 05:18 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:01:18AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> If "!bool_case", it returns unexpected value instead of STATUS_SUCCESS,
>>> so need fix it, the related warning (with allmodconfig under hexagon):
>>>
>>> CC [M] drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_download.o
>>> drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_download.c: In function 'request_code_segment':
>>> drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_download.c:581:6: warning: 'status' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>
> Thanks. :-)
>
>>> .../staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_download.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_download.c b/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_download.c
>>> index 68ded17..15f3062 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_download.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_download.c
>>> @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static int request_code_segment(struct ft1000_usb *ft1000dev, u16 **s_file,
>>> u8 **c_file, const u8 *endpoint, bool boot_case)
>>> {
>>> long word_length;
>>> - int status;
>>> + int status = STATUS_SUCCESS;
>>>
>>> /*DEBUG("FT1000:REQUEST_CODE_SEGMENT\n");i*/
>>> word_length = get_request_value(ft1000dev);
>>> --
>>> 1.7.7.6
>
>
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/