On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:36:49PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:introduce arm_core.c and its related head file, after this patch,Given we've already pulled in linux/init.h, which has pulled in
we can get ACPI tables from BIOS on ARM64 now.
Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 57 +++++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 8 ++
drivers/acpi/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/acpi/plat/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c | 219 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 287 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/plat/Makefile
create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
index c186f5b..e9444e4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -19,6 +19,43 @@
#ifndef _ASM_ARM_ACPI_H
#define _ASM_ARM_ACPI_H
+#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+
+#include <linux/init.h>
+
+#define COMPILER_DEPENDENT_INT64 long long
+#define COMPILER_DEPENDENT_UINT64 unsigned long long
linux/types.h, is there any reason we can't use s64 and u64 here?
If we can, then why don't we unify this further up so each arch doesn't
have to define this redundantly?
+Can you elaborate on when ACPI needs to use this?
+/*
+ * Calling conventions:
+ *
+ * ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE - Interfaces to host OS (handlers, threads)
+ * ACPI_EXTERNAL_XFACE - External ACPI interfaces
+ * ACPI_INTERNAL_XFACE - Internal ACPI interfaces
+ * ACPI_INTERNAL_VAR_XFACE - Internal variable-parameter list interfaces
+ */
+#define ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE
+#define ACPI_EXTERNAL_XFACE
+#define ACPI_INTERNAL_XFACE
+#define ACPI_INTERNAL_VAR_XFACE
+
+/* Asm macros */
+#define ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE() flush_cache_all()