Hi Rob,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Linus, I hope this can be merged during the -rc cycle of 3.13, since the
>> > gpiod_ interface is going to be introduced there. It would not make much
>> > sense for it to come without its documentation.
>>
>> You're right of course. I'll read through it and apply fixes on top
>> (or squash into your patch.)
>>
>> Formal stuff:
>> Don't we need an 00-INDEX file?
>> (Maybe Rob can tell whether this is desirable.)
>
>
> A 00-INDEX file wouldn't hurt, but it can always be added later. No reason
> to hold up the series for that. (I was using them to generate html indexes
> for kernel.org/doc but after the breakin they eliminated all non-git
> functionality so I haven't been able to update it since. They replaced
> kernel.org/doc/Documentation with a raw git checkout, and I expect them to
> replace kernel.org/doc/menuconfig with a raw git checkout any day now.)
>
> That said, a 00-INDEX file would let you know where to start reading to find
> the file with the intro paragraph at the start of the old file, the bit
> explaining what GPIO is. Here the first file alphabetically is "board.txt",
> and I have no idea why it's named that, given how it starts. (I was sort of
> hoping that somebody who already knows the subsystem would comment before I
> do. I have no way of knowing if this documentation is _right_.)
I actually submitted a patch that introduces a 00-INDEX file
yesterday. It's probably a few other gazillions mails under in your
inbox. ;)
> But I really don't have time to go through every paragraph like that, and
> was hoping the gpio guys would (or just sign off on it so I don't have
> to)...
I will make another pass and send an update (or a new version of the
patch maybe, since we are still in -rc1 - whatever is more convenient
to Linus). Hopefully early users of the new (oops) interface will send
fixes to the documentation as well, if only to improve my approximate
English.