RE: [PATCH] crypto: remove unnecessary includes

[Cristian Stoica]

Hi Herbert,

Your original response was terse and left me more puzzled. Do you have a sensible explanation why some includes should be kept in the source even they serve no purpose during the build?

Thanks,

Cristian S.



> > Just because it compiles it doesn't meant that the files you
> > removed are unnecessary.
> >
> > The only file that is really unnecessary here is spinlock.h.
> >
> []
> OK then, but let's reverse the question. In a construct similar to
> authenc.c, what would be the purpose of slab.h and kernel.h?
> (That leads to the next question which is - what is the purpose of those
> files in authenc.c?)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/