Re: [RFC part1 PATCH 5/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce arm_core.c andits related head file

[Hanjun Guo]

On 2013å12æ05æ 22:09, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> > +
> >   #endif /*_ASM_ARM_ACPI_H*/
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > index bd9bbd0..8199360 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/memblock.h>
> >   #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
> >   #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> >
> >   #include <asm/cputype.h>
> >   #include <asm/elf.h>
> > @@ -225,6 +226,13 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> >
> >          arm64_memblock_init();
> >
> > +       /*
> > +        * Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time configuration
> > +        */
> > +       acpi_boot_table_init();
> > +       early_acpi_boot_init();
> > +       acpi_boot_init();
> > +
> How about a single function here. Perhaps called acpi_early_init. That
> would save checking acpi_disabled 3 times.

It is separated for some reasons on intel platforms, one of them
is ACPI based memory hot-plug, SRAT (NUMA related ACPI table)
and its related memory initialization should be finished between
early_acpi_boot_init() and acpi_boot_init().

I keep this code unchanged for future use (memory hotplug)
on ARM, is this make sense to you?

> >          paging_init();
> >          request_standard_resources();
[...]
> > lic License for more details.
> > + *
> > + * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > +#include <linux/acpi_pmtmr.h>
> > +#include <linux/efi.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> > +#include <linux/memblock.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/irq.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/bootmem.h>
> > +#include <linux/ioport.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > +
> > +#include <asm/pgtable.h>
> > +#include <asm/io.h>
> linux/io.h although I can't see where it is even needed.
>
> > +#include <asm/smp.h>
> linux/smp.h ...
>
> Seems like you have a lot of unnecessary headers here. efi.h, slab.h,
> pci.h, etc.

Thanks for the reminding, will update and clean them up.

> > +
> > +/*
> > + * We never plan to use RSDT on arm/arm64 as its deprecated in spec but this
> > + * variable is still required by the ACPI core
> > + */
> > +u32 acpi_rsdt_forced;
> > +
> > +int acpi_noirq;                        /* skip ACPI IRQ initialization */
> > +int acpi_strict;
> > +int acpi_disabled;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_disabled);
> > +
> > +int acpi_pci_disabled;         /* skip ACPI PCI scan and IRQ initialization */
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_disabled);
> > +
> > +#define PREFIX                 "ACPI: "
> > +
> > +/* FIXME: this function should be moved to topology.c when it is ready */
> > +void arch_fix_phys_package_id(int num, u32 slot)
> > +{
> > +       return;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_fix_phys_package_id);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Boot-time Configuration
> > + */
> > +
> It is not really clear what this comment applies to.

Yes, only leading some confusion, will remove it.

> > +enum acpi_irq_model_id acpi_irq_model = ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PLATFORM;
> > +
> > +static unsigned int gsi_to_irq(unsigned int gsi)
> > +{
> > +       int irq = irq_create_mapping(NULL, gsi);
> > +
> > +       return irq;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * __acpi_map_table() will be called before page_init(), so early_ioremap()
> > + * or early_memremap() should be called here.
> > + *
> > + * FIXME: early_io/memremap()/early_iounmap() are not upstream yet on ARM64,
> > + * just wait for Mark Salter's patchset accepted by mainline
> > + */
> > +char *__init __acpi_map_table(unsigned long phys, unsigned long size)
> > +{
> > +       if (!phys || !size)
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * temporarily use phys_to_virt(),
> > +        * should be early_memremap(phys, size) here
> > +        */
> > +       return phys_to_virt(phys);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __init __acpi_unmap_table(char *map, unsigned long size)
> > +{
> > +       if (!map || !size)
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       /* should be early_iounmap(map, size); */
> > +       return;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int acpi_gsi_to_irq(u32 gsi, unsigned int *irq)
> > +{
> > +       *irq = gsi_to_irq(gsi);
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_gsi_to_irq);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * success: return IRQ number (>=0)
> '> 0' for interrupts is what normally means success in the kernel. 0
> is for no irq.

Will update :)

> > + * failure: return < 0
> > + */
> > +int acpi_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity)
> > +{
> > +       return -1;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_register_gsi);
[...]
> > +
> > +static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
> > +{
> > +       if (!arg)
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +       /* "acpi=off" disables both ACPI table parsing and interpreter */
> > +       if (strcmp(arg, "off") == 0) {
> > +               disable_acpi();
> > +       }
> > +       /* acpi=strict disables out-of-spec workarounds */
> > +       else if (strcmp(arg, "strict") == 0) {
> > +               acpi_strict = 1;
> > +       }
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +early_param("acpi", parse_acpi);
> These aren't common options across architectures?

Different architectures have different options,
such as x86, it has more options which ARM is not needed.

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/