[PATCH 3.5 13/90] drm/ttm: Fix memory type compatibility check

From: Luis Henriques
Date: Thu Dec 05 2013 - 12:36:42 EST


3.5.7.27 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 59c8e66378fb78adbcd05f0d09783dde6fef282b upstream.

Also check the busy placements before deciding to move a buffer object.
Failing to do this may result in a completely unneccessary move within a
single memory type.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ luis: backported to 3.5: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 36f4b28..a414452 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -1099,24 +1099,32 @@ out_unlock:
return ret;
}

-static int ttm_bo_mem_compat(struct ttm_placement *placement,
- struct ttm_mem_reg *mem)
+static bool ttm_bo_mem_compat(struct ttm_placement *placement,
+ struct ttm_mem_reg *mem,
+ uint32_t *new_flags)
{
int i;

if (mem->mm_node && placement->lpfn != 0 &&
(mem->start < placement->fpfn ||
mem->start + mem->num_pages > placement->lpfn))
- return -1;
+ return false;

for (i = 0; i < placement->num_placement; i++) {
- if ((placement->placement[i] & mem->placement &
- TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING) &&
- (placement->placement[i] & mem->placement &
- TTM_PL_MASK_MEM))
- return i;
+ *new_flags = placement->placement[i];
+ if ((*new_flags & mem->placement & TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING) &&
+ (*new_flags & mem->placement & TTM_PL_MASK_MEM))
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < placement->num_busy_placement; i++) {
+ *new_flags = placement->busy_placement[i];
+ if ((*new_flags & mem->placement & TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING) &&
+ (*new_flags & mem->placement & TTM_PL_MASK_MEM))
+ return true;
}
- return -1;
+
+ return false;
}

int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
@@ -1125,6 +1133,7 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
bool no_wait_gpu)
{
int ret;
+ uint32_t new_flags;

BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&bo->reserved));
/* Check that range is valid */
@@ -1135,8 +1144,7 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
/*
* Check whether we need to move buffer.
*/
- ret = ttm_bo_mem_compat(placement, &bo->mem);
- if (ret < 0) {
+ if (!ttm_bo_mem_compat(placement, &bo->mem, &new_flags)) {
ret = ttm_bo_move_buffer(bo, placement, interruptible, no_wait_reserve, no_wait_gpu);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -1145,7 +1153,7 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
* Use the access and other non-mapping-related flag bits from
* the compatible memory placement flags to the active flags
*/
- ttm_flag_masked(&bo->mem.placement, placement->placement[ret],
+ ttm_flag_masked(&bo->mem.placement, new_flags,
~TTM_PL_MASK_MEMTYPE);
}
/*
--
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/