Re: [BUG] Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] aerdrv: Trace Event for AER

[Borislav Petkov]

On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:21:10AM -0700, Betty Dall wrote:
> The definition of the GHES_SEV* matches up with the error severity
> definition of the CPER records as defined in the UEFI spec section
> N.2.1:
> "Indicates the severity of the error condition. The severity of
> the error record corresponds to the most severe error
> section.
> 0 - Recoverable (also called non-fatal uncorrected)
> 1 - Fatal
> 2 - Corrected
> 3 - Informational
> All other values are reserved.
> Note that severity of "Informational" indicates that the record
> could be safely ignored by error handling software."

Actually, we can go even one radical step further and drop
ghes_severity() completely because GHES severity in the ACPI spec 5.0 is
defined almost exactly the same:

"18.3.2.6.1 Generic Error Data

...

Identifies the error severity of the reported error:
0 â Recoverableï
1 â Fatalï
2 â Correctedï
3 â None
Note: This is the error severity of the entire event. Each Generic
Error Data Entry also includes its own Error Severity field."

I don't know which version of the spec dictated

enum {
        GHES_SEV_NO = 0x0,
        GHES_SEV_CORRECTED = 0x1,
        GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE = 0x2,
        GHES_SEV_PANIC = 0x3,
};

though and whether we're going to have to differentiate between the old
and GHES numerical severity levels. Which, if we have to, would be very
nasty...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/