Re: [patch 7/8] mm, memcg: allow processes handling oomnotifications to access reserves

[Johannes Weiner]

Hello Tim!

On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 08:38:20AM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> We actually started with kernel patches all h these lines - per-memcg
> scores and all of our crazy policy requirements.
> 
> It turns out that changing policies is hard.
>
> When David offered the opportunity to manage it all in user space it
> sounded like a great idea.
> 
> If this can be made to work as a high prio daemon with access to reserves,
> we would like it.

We can not talk solutions if you won't describe the problem.  It's
understandable that you can't talk about internal details, but it's
possible to describe a technical problem in a portable fashion such
that people can understand and evaluate it without knowing your whole
application.  Companies do this all the time.

"The way our blackbox works makes it really hard to hook it up to the
Linux kernel" is not a very convincing technical argument to change
the Linux kernel.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/