Re: [PATCH] xen/debugfs: Check debugfs initialization before using it
From: Ethan Zhao
Date: Sun Dec 08 2013 - 20:43:44 EST
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 07:31:02PM +0800, ethan.zhao wrote:
>> Should check debugfs initialization with debugfs_initialized() before using it,
>> Because if it isn't initialized, the return value of fake debugfs_create_dir() etc
>> functions would be ERR_PTR(-ENODEV), checking with NULL will not work.
>
> So? It should "just work" without this check, right? What happens if
> your patch isn't applied and debugfs isn't enabled?
If debugfs isn't configured, debugfs_initialized() and other
functions are defined as following,
static inline bool debugfs_initialized(void)
{
return false;
}
static inline struct dentry *debugfs_create_file(const char *name, umode_t mode,
struct dentry *parent, void *data,
const struct file_operations *fops)
{
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
}
static inline struct dentry *debugfs_create_dir(const char *name,
struct dentry *parent)
{
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
}
And the checking code in xen\debugfs.c xen_init_debugfs() will not
work, the return value is not NULL.
d_xen_debug = debugfs_create_dir("xen", NULL);
if (!d_xen_debug)
pr_warning("Could not create 'xen' debugfs directory\n");
>
> greg k-h
>
>> Signed-off-by: ethan.zhao <ethan.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Please put your "real" name here, not one with a '.' in it.
The real name used in company is ethan.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx, but I
couldn't send and receive mails of
community with that mailbox for some reason you may know.
Thanks,
Ethan
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/