Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] futex: Avoid taking hb lock if nothing to wakeup

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:36:36AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 18:15 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > - * The length of the list is tracked with atomic ops (hb->waiters),
> > - * providing the necessary memory barriers for the waiters. For the
> > - * waker side, however, we rely on get_futex_key_refs(), using either
> > - * ihold() or the atomic_inc(), for shared futexes. The former provides
> > - * a full mb on all architectures. For architectures that do not have an
> > - * implicit barrier in atomic_inc/dec, we explicitly add it - please
> > - * refer to futex_get_mm() and hb_waiters_inc/dec().
> 
> IMHO this text gives a nice summary instead of documenting each function
> with this things like '... implies MB (B)'. Anyway, I'll resend this
> patch with your corrections.

Right, I didn't much care for that. Once you know that you need them and
what for, the actual finding of the barriers is usually a 'trivial'
matter.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/