Re: [PATCH] ALSA: at73c213: clk_round_rate() can return a zero uponerror
From: Paul Walmsley
Date: Tue Dec 10 2013 - 14:46:50 EST
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:40:48 -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Treat both negative and zero return values from clk_round_rate()
as errors. This is needed since subsequent patches will convert
clk_round_rate()'s return value to be an unsigned type, rather
than a signed type, since some clock sources can generate rates higher
than (2^31)-1 Hz.
Is the behavior "returning zero upon error" already in 3.13? That is,
should this (and another) patch be taken as a 3.13-fix patch, or it's
for 3.14?
It depends on the platform. The Common Clock Framework code returns 0
upon error right now. But other clock framework implementations, such as
the one used by the Atmel AT91 boards, return negative error codes. And
looking at the mainline code, it looks like the at73c213 chip is most
likely to be used on AT91 boards.
So if you want to send this patch for v3.13-rc, it's probably justified,
but it's low-priority. v3.14 is also fine.
I'll be sending some followup patches to the platform maintainers to
change the clock framework code to return 0 upon error. But those can't
be applied until the drivers are fixed, if we want to avoid regressions in
error path handling. So from that point of view, applying these driver
patches in v3.13-rc would mean there is less delay to getting the platform
clock framework fixes upstream :-)
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/