Re: 50 Watt idle power regression bisected to Linux-3.10
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Dec 11 2013 - 12:48:37 EST
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 04:09:11PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Another thing that is required I think is to issue a write barrier
> > > > before CLFLUSH instruction. By my (possibly incorrect ...) reading of
> > > > the documentation CLFLUSH does not appear to be ordered (at all), so
> > > > it might execute before the modification to the affected memory?
> > >
> > > We already have a write barrier in the code which modifies
> > > current_thread_info()->flags.
> >
> > Which code is that, could you please cite it? (I tried finding it but
> > my grep-fu failed me.)
>
> current_set_polling_and_test().
Thx, those variants have the right barrier indeed.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/