Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] PCI/MSI: Introduce pcim_enable_msi*() family helpers

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:11:01PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 04:16:02PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> > What's the reason for using the "pcim_" prefix?  To me, that suggests that
>> > this is a "managed" interface in the sense described in
>> > Documentation/driver-model/devres.txt, where resources are automatically
>> > deallocated when the driver detaches.  But I don't see anything like that
>> > happening in this patch.
>>
>> Oh.. right. What about pci_auto_ prefix to indicate automatic fallback
>> logic? Or may be even pcia_ ?
>
> I'd vote for pci_auto, one-off single char pre/postfixes usually get
> pretty confusing.

Sounds good to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/