Re: [PATCH V10 02/14] xen/pvh: Extend vcpu_guest_context, p2m,event, and XenBus.

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Fri Dec 13 2013 - 09:28:12 EST


On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:56:24AM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 13/12/13 02:10, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Make gdt_frames[]/gdt_ents into a union with {gdtaddr, gdtsz},
> > as PVH only needs to send down gdtaddr and gdtsz in the
> > vcpu_guest_context structure..
> >
> > For interrupts, PVH uses native_irq_ops so we can skip most of the
> > PV ones. In the future we can support the pirq_eoi_map..
> > Also VCPU hotplug is currently not available for PVH.
> >
> > For events (and IRQs) we follow what PVHVM does - so use callback
> > vector. Lastly, for XenBus we use the same logic that is used in
> > the PVHVM case.
> [...]
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/interface.h
> > @@ -145,7 +145,16 @@ struct vcpu_guest_context {
> > struct cpu_user_regs user_regs; /* User-level CPU registers */
> > struct trap_info trap_ctxt[256]; /* Virtual IDT */
> > unsigned long ldt_base, ldt_ents; /* LDT (linear address, # ents) */
> > - unsigned long gdt_frames[16], gdt_ents; /* GDT (machine frames, # ents) */
> > + union {
> > + struct {
> > + /* PV: GDT (machine frames, # ents).*/
> > + unsigned long gdt_frames[16], gdt_ents;
> > + } pv;
> > + struct {
> > + /* PVH: GDTR addr and size */
> > + unsigned long gdtaddr, gdtsz;
> > + } pvh;
> > + } u;
>
> Doesn't match the hypervisor.

Right. Mukesh is going to post follow on patches to fix that.

>
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> > @@ -800,8 +800,10 @@ bool __set_phys_to_machine(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long mfn)
> > unsigned topidx, mididx, idx;
> >
> > /* don't track P2M changes in autotranslate guests */
> > - if (unlikely(xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap)))
> > + if (unlikely(xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))) {
> > + BUG_ON(pfn != mfn && mfn != INVALID_P2M_ENTRY);
> > return true;
> > + }
>
> Isn't this undoing a recent change that removed this BUG_ON()?

This one:
commit 2f558d40911c1b8f929b8a382833ae1da5df3293
Author: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Oct 9 20:39:01 2013 +0000

xen/x86: allow __set_phys_to_machine for autotranslate guests

Allow __set_phys_to_machine to be called for autotranslate guests.
It can be used to keep track of phys_to_machine changes, however we
don't do anything with the information at the moment.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I am not actually sure why the BUG_ON was removed in Stefano's patch.
Stefano?

>
> David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/