Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] clk: bcm281xx: add initial clock framework support

[Mike Turquette]

On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Alex Elder <alex.elder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In the mean time, I have created a new branch that
> is based on v3.13-rc4 (and includes Tim's prerequisite
> patches).  Pull request (still wrapped my my mailer)
> is below.

Hi Alex,

This isn't a mess but is pretty normal. Can you create a new branch
with only your 2 clock patches applied on top of my clk-next branch?
You should merge "ARM: dts: bcm281xx: define real clocks" through the
arm-soc tree. Then you can send another pull request to me which has
just the 2 bcm clock patches based on clk-next and everything will
eventually end up linux-next all together.

Just FYI if I took your pull request as-is then the clk-next tree
would become polluted with lots of extra bcm patches.

Regards,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/