Re: [PATCH v5 10/14] efi: only print saved efi runtime maps insteadof all memmap ranges for kexec
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Mon Dec 16 2013 - 06:33:32 EST
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:00:10AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > - print_efi_memmap();
> > > + if (efi_setup) {
> > > + int s;
> > > + struct efi_setup_data *data;
> > > +
> > > + s = sizeof(*data) + nr_efi_runtime_map * sizeof(data->map[0]);
> > > + data = early_memremap(efi_setup, s);
> > > + if (!data)
> > > + return;
> > > + print_efi_memmap(data->map, nr_efi_runtime_map,
> > > + sizeof(data->map[0]));
> > > + early_memunmap(data, s);
> >
> > Well, if you call print_efi_memmap() in parse_efi_setup() you can save
> > yourself that map/unmaping no?
>
> In parse_efi_setup, I need map twice as well:
Well, your v6 has a something completely different:
void __init parse_efi_setup(u64 phys_addr)
{
efi_setup = phys_addr;
}
There's no mapping at all anymore. So please redo your reply against v6.
> Another where what I print in this patch is same position what
> non-kexec kernel does, it looks better that print them only if earlier
> init is ok.
-ENOPARSE.
All I'm saying is, if you're going to memremap/memunmap efi_setup,
then do it once in efi_setup_init() as you do already and call
print_efi_memmap from there - no need to do work twice for no reason.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/