Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf-bench: introduce futex microbenchmarks

[Davidlohr Bueso]

On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 11:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This patchset adds three programs that stress and measure different 
> > futex operations: (i) uaddr hashing, (ii) wakeups and (iii) 
> > requeuing/waiting.
> > 
> > More details and usage examples in each individual patch, along with 
> > parameter descriptions in the code.
> > 
> > While the previous effort (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/17/207) to 
> > add futex benchmarks to perf-bench failed, I strongly believe that 
> > perf is an ideal place for these kinds of programs. This patchset is 
> > different from Hitoshi's because it does not try to take over 
> > Darren's futextest suite, and only deals with finer grained aspects 
> > of the kernel's implementation, and thus mostly useful for kernel 
> > hacking. Furthermore, by being part of the kernel tree, it can get 
> > more attention and naturally evolve with time.
> 
> Looks pretty useful!
> 
> Could the two approaches be merged?

Unless Darren doesn't want to, I don't see why not. I can resurrect
Hitoshi's original patch if/after this series is applied.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/