Re: [PATCH] afs: proc cells and rootcell are writeable

From: Pali RohÃr
Date: Tue Dec 17 2013 - 08:19:48 EST


On Monday 16 December 2013 08:00:04 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:30:55 +0100 Pali Roh__r
<pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Both proc files are writeable and used for configuring
> > cells. But there is missing correct mode flag for writeable
> > files. Without this patch both proc files are read only.
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/afs/proc.c b/fs/afs/proc.c
> > index 526e4bb..276cb6e 100644
> > --- a/fs/afs/proc.c
> > +++ b/fs/afs/proc.c
> > @@ -147,11 +147,11 @@ int afs_proc_init(void)
> >
> > if (!proc_afs)
> >
> > goto error_dir;
> >
> > - p = proc_create("cells", 0, proc_afs,
> > &afs_proc_cells_fops); + p = proc_create("cells", S_IFREG |
> > S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, proc_afs, &afs_proc_cells_fops);
> >
> > if (!p)
> >
> > goto error_cells;
> >
> > - p = proc_create("rootcell", 0, proc_afs,
> > &afs_proc_rootcell_fops); + p = proc_create("rootcell",
> > S_IFREG | S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, proc_afs,
> > &afs_proc_rootcell_fops);
> >
> > if (!p)
> >
> > goto error_rootcell;
>
> Please send a signed-off-by: for this, as per
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches, section 12.
>
> David ack?

Sorry, I forgot to add Signed-off-by. Here it is:

Signed-off-by: Pali RohÃr <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx>

--
Pali RohÃr
pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.