Re: Spurious timeouts in mvmdio

[Nicolas Schichan]

On 12/16/2013 07:28 PM, Leigh Brown wrote:

> I prefer this patch (which I think you originally proposed) because it is just as
> correct and the code size is a bit smaller in arm mode, and the same size in
> thumb
> mode (on my compiler gcc 4.7.2, at least).  I coded the loop in that way to
> make it
> small.
>
> I don't mind submitting it to David as I made the mistake in the first place.
>
> Regards,
>
> Leigh.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c
> index 7354960..a42a750 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvmdio.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,12 @@ static int orion_mdio_wait_ready(struct mii_bus *bus)
>               if (time_is_before_jiffies(end))
>                   ++timedout;
>               } else {
> +            /* wait_event_timeout does not guarantee a delay of at
> +             * least one whole jiffie, so timeout must be no less
> +             * than two.
> +             */
> +             if (timeout < 2)
> +                 timeout = 2;
>               wait_event_timeout(dev->smi_busy_wait,
>                              orion_mdio_smi_is_done(dev),
>                              timeout);

Hi Leigh,

My original patch changed "timeout" before the entering the while loop, but 
I'm fine with your patch too.

Feel free to add my:

Tested-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@xxxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

--
Nicolas Schichan
Freebox SAS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/