Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / Sleep: Freeze filesystems during system suspend/hibernation
From: Josh Boyer
Date: Tue Dec 17 2013 - 11:03:08 EST
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday, May 25, 2012, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> commit b94887bbc0621e1e8402e7f0ec4bc3adf46c9a6e
>> >> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
>> >> Date: Fri Feb 17 12:42:08 2012 -0500
>> >>
>> >> Freeze all filesystems during system suspend and (kernel-driven)
>> >> hibernation by calling freeze_supers() for all superblocks and thaw
>> >> them during the subsequent resume with the help of thaw_supers().
>> >>
>> >> This makes filesystems stay in a consistent state in case something
>> >> goes wrong between system suspend (or hibernation) and the subsequent
>> >> resume (e.g. journal replays won't be necessary in those cases). In
>> >> particular, this should help to solve a long-standing issue that, in
>> >> some cases, during resume from hibernation the boot loader causes the
>> >> journal to be replied for the filesystem containing the kernel image
>> >> and/or initrd causing it to become inconsistent with the information
>> >> stored in the hibernation image.
>> >>
>> >> The user-space-driven hibernation (s2disk) is not covered by this
>> >> change, because the freezing of filesystems prevents s2disk from
>> >> accessing device special files it needs to do its job.
>> >>
>> >> This change is based on earlier work by Nigel Cunningham.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> Rebased to 3.3-rc3 by Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Did this patch ever wind up going anywhere? Fedora has it sitting in
>> our tree with a comment that says "rebase" and I don't see it in the
>> linux-next tree at all.
>>
>> Did if fall through the cracks or was it NAKed somewhere?
>
> No, it wasn't in principle. There were some comments I haven't addressed yet.
Dredging up a really old thread, sorry.
We're still carrying this patch along in Fedora. Should we drop it at
this point, or is it still eventually going to head upstream?
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/