Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 09:33:47AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:30 AM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/alpha/include/asm/Kbuild
> > index f01fb50..a73a8e2 100644
> > --- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/Kbuild
> > +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/Kbuild
> > @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ generic-y += clkdev.h
> >  generic-y += exec.h
> >  generic-y += trace_clock.h
> >  generic-y += preempt.h
> > +generic-y += hash.h
> 
> Please keep them sorted.
> 
> Yes, Peter violated that too, when adding preempt.h.

So what I did was something like:

for i in arch/*/include/asm/Kbuild
do
	echo "generic-y += preempt.h" >> $i
done

Whoever is going to hand edit all gazillion archs for changes like that?
And sort(1) is annoying in that it doesn't do in-place sort; you'll end
up with empty files if you try the naive thing.

Worse most of those Kbuild files include other random garbage, which
makes automated sorting harder still.

So unless there's a sane and easy way to keep it sorted; I'm going to
ignore that rule.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/