Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: tegra: Re-model Tegra cpufreq driver

[Viresh Kumar]

On 17 December 2013 16:22, bilhuang <bilhuang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tegra20 DVFS is a little bit complicated due to the fact that we can't scale
> VDD_CPU directly, there are constraints or relationship to other power rails
> so I don't think it is a good idea to use generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver if
> we're going to support voltage scaling.

But why can't we handle that in a CPU specific regulator code?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/