Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v11 08/12] xen/pvh: MMU changes for PVH

[Stefano Stabellini]

On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > @@ -1834,6 +1845,9 @@ static void convert_pfn_mfn(void *v)
> > >  	pte_t *pte = v;
> > >  	int i;
> > >  
> > > +	if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > >  	/* All levels are converted the same way, so just treat them
> > >  	   as ptes. */
> > >  	for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++)
> > 
> > This is getting pretty bad.
> > Can we find a way to refactor xen_setup_kernel_pagetable so that we
> > don't need all this? Maybe we need a new function?
> 
> Is it that bad? Doing a copy of xen_setup_kernel_pagetable just
> for PVH strikes me as error prone. Having the checks in the
> functions that xen_setup_kernel_pagetable is much easier and
> nicer I think.
> 
> Maybe if we did a big 'if (xen_feature(XEN..)' inside of
> xen_setup_kernel_pagetable that would be easier?

Yes, that should make things clearer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/