Re: [PATCH 1/1] dmaengine: fix incorrect kernel-doc comment forstruct dma_slave_config

[Vinod Koul]

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:12:17PM +0400, Alexander Popov wrote:
> The 'direction' member of 'struct dma_slave_config' is of data
> type 'enum dma_transfer_direction', so update the kernel-doc comment
> for 'struct dma_slave_config' to refer to appropriate values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov <a13xp0p0v88@xxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks

--
~Vinod

> ---
>  include/linux/dmaengine.h | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> index 41cf0c3..bd6b882 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> @@ -305,9 +305,8 @@ enum dma_slave_buswidth {
>  /**
>   * struct dma_slave_config - dma slave channel runtime config
>   * @direction: whether the data shall go in or out on this slave
> - * channel, right now. DMA_TO_DEVICE and DMA_FROM_DEVICE are
> - * legal values, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL is not acceptable since we
> - * need to differentiate source and target addresses.
> + * channel, right now. DMA_MEM_TO_DEV and DMA_DEV_TO_MEM are
> + * legal values.
>   * @src_addr: this is the physical address where DMA slave data
>   * should be read (RX), if the source is memory this argument is
>   * ignored.
> -- 
> 1.8.4.2
> 

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/